Sanjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57009 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -113 Year- 2017 Thana -DARAUNDHA District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Sanjay Singh, S/o Nitya Nand Singh, resident of Village- Sherpur, P.S.- Durauda, District- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Darauda P.S.Case No. 113 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 308 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 30 & 38 of Bihar excise Act, 2016. From the written report it appears that recovery has been made from the road, adjacent to Railway crossing and from PAX. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the identification of Choukidar as one of the person, who attempted to run away.

It is mentioned in para-3 that the petitioner has clean antecedent.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner, Sanjay Singh in the event of his arrest of surrender

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57009 of 2017 (2) dt.01-12-2017 2/2 within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- ( Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Siwan in connection with Darauda P.S.Case No. 113 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. with other conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) Sudha/- U T