Surendra Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3261 of 2018 ====================================================== Surendra Tiwari, Son of Late Yageshwar Tiwari, resident of VillageVaidyanathpur, Damdama, P.O. and P.S.- Vidyapati Nagar, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Commissioner, MANREGA, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The District Magistrate, Cum Collector, Samastipur. 6.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Dalsingsarai Sub Division, DistrictSamastipur. 7.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, District- Samastipur. 8.

The Circle Officer, Vidyapatinagar Block, District- Samastipur. 9.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Construction Division, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur.

10.

The Gram Panchayat Raj Mau Dhaneshpur North under Block Vidyapatinagar through Panchayat Secretary 11.

The Programme Officer MANREGA, Block Vidyapatinagar, Samastipur. 12.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Mau Dhaneshpur, Block Vidyapatinagar, District- Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam- Aag12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 08-05-2019 In view of the stand taken by the respondents in the counter affidavit, the present writ application has become infructuous. It is accordingly, disposed of.

In the event any part of the land is still under the

Patna High Court CWJC No.3261 of 2018(4) dt.08-05-2019 2/2 occupation of the State of Bihar, the petitioner may raise the grievance before the District Magistrate, Samastipur and on enquiry if the District Magistrate finds that the land of the petitioner has been used by the State of Bihar, the District Magistrate may take steps for payment of compensation in terms of 2013 Act for the part of land of the petitioner still used by the State of Bihar.

With the aforesaid, this application stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U