Priyanka Kumari @ Priyanka Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66155 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2016 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

PRIYANKA KUMARI @ PRIYANKA DEVI Wife of Sri Satish Kumar @ Satish Saw @ Satish Kumar Sah R/v- Khairma, P.S. and District- Jamui 2.

SATISH KUMAR @ SATISH SAW @ SATISH KUMAR SAH Son of Sri Fakira Saw R/v- Khairma, P.S. and District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prakash Mahto For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Kishor Singh Mr.Diwakar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 342, 326, 325, 307, 325, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is alleged that on the order of co-accused Sarojni Devi, petitioner no. 1 (Priyanka Devi) brought kerosene oil and co-accused Dinesh Saw and petitioner no. 2 (Satish Saw) ordered to set the informant on fire and thereafter, co-accused Fakira Saw ignite match-stick and set the victim on fire, but on hulla, local people saved the life of informant.

4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that due to petty family dispute between the parties, this false and concocted case has been lodged. It is further submitted that police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet and not sent

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66155 of 2022(3) dt.14-07-2023 2/2 up for trial these two petitioners, however; learned Magistrate, differing with the same, took cognizance against all the accused persons including these petitioners. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. - II, Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 265 of 2016, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T