← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17042/2016withdrawn

Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-10-17The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17042 of 2016 =========================================================== Ajay Kumar son of Sitaram Kesara, resident of Mohalla- Khanjahanpur Ward No. 29, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Gaya.

3. Municipal Corporation, Gaya.

4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Gaya.

5. Land Reforms Deputy Commissioner, Sadar, Gaya.

6. The Circle Officer, Manpur Block, District- Gaya.

7. Md. Habib Hussain son of late Abdul Sakur, resident of Mohalla- Ward No. 29, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya.

8. Md. Satvan son of Sobrati Miyan, resident of Mohalla- Saidpur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Asif Kalim, Advocate. For the Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 17-10-2016 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Asif Kalim, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. We have heard also Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17042 of 2016 dt.17-10-2016 2/2 No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I. A. Ansari, CJ) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Prakash/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 21.10.2016 Transmission Date