Patna High CourtC. REV./221/2015dismissed

Most Sundari Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Revenue And Land Reforms Department And ORS

2016-02-10Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.221 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 888 of 2009 ======================================================

1. Most Sundari Devi widow of Late Srikrishna Pasi

2. Most Kalaktari Devi @ Kalaketari Devi widow of Late Rama Shankar Pasi

3. Suresh Pasi son of Late Ram Krishna Pasi

4. Hare Krishna Pasi @ Hari Krishna Pasi son of Late Ramanand Pasi All residents of Village - Sonebarsha, Police Station - Nawanagar, District - Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Collector, Buxar.

3. The Anchal Adhikari, Buxar.

4. The Officer-in-Charge, Nawanagar Police Station, District - Buxar.

5. Suresh Sah Gupta son of Gauri Shankar Prasad Sah

6. Vikrama Prasad son of Mangaru Sah

7. Gauri Shankar Prasad son of Jhingru Prasad Sah Gupta Opposite Parties Nos. 5 to 7 are residents of Village - Sonbarsha, Police Station - Sonbarsha, District - Buxar.

.... .... Opposite party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Nayan Singh, Advocate For the Opp.Party Nos.1 to 4 : Mr. Lala S.N.Rais, AC to GP 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2016 The present civil review application has been filed on behalf of the original writ petitioners seeking a review of the judgment and order dated 13.08.2015 passed in CWJC No. 888 of 2009 along with connected Interlocutory Applications, whereby the aforesaid writ petition filed on behalf of the present review petitioners was finally disposed of and the matter was remitted back to the Anchal Adhikari, Nawanagar with a direction to dispose of the matter afresh in accordance with law. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned State counsel appearing on behalf

Patna High Court C. REV. No.221 of 2015 (2) dt.10-02-2016 2/2 of the opposite party nos. 1 to 4 and after going through the order under review, this Court does not find any good ground to review the aforesaid judgment/order dated 13.08.2015 passed in CWJC No. 888 of 2009. The present review application is completely misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U