Ram Surat Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16287 of 2016 =========================================================== Ram Surat Rai son of Late Ram Briksh Rai, resident of Village Macchagar Tola Guman Rai, P.O. Hathwa, P.S. Hathwa, District Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Jai Prakash University Chapra through Registrar, Jai Prakash University Dak Bunglow Road Chapra, District Saran.

3. The Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Dak Bunglow Road, Chapra, District Saran.

4. The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Dak Bunglow Road, Chapra, District Saran.

5. The Finance Officer, Jai Prakash University, Dak Bunglow Road, Chapra, District Saran.

6. The Principal-cum-Professor Incharge, Gopeshwar College, Hathwa, District Gopalganj, under J.P. University, Chapra

7. The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-04-2018 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State and J. P. University (hereinafter referred to as the 'University') have assisted the Court.

2. Counter affidavit has also been filed on behalf of the State as well as the University, after service of copy on learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The stand taken in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the University is that all admitted retiral dues of the petitioner have been paid. Calculation chart with regard to payments has also been

Patna High Court CWJC No.16287 of 2016 dt.11-04-2018 2/2 brought on record.

4. In view of the aforesaid position and taking note of the fact that neither any counsel has appeared on behalf the petitioner nor any rejoinder filed on his behalf, the Court can only presume that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed and he is no more interested in pursuing the matter.

5. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off. However, if the petitioner finds that any payment to which he is entitled has remained unpaid, he shall be at liberty to file a detailed representation bringing materials on record to show that how such payment is due to him and has not been paid, before the respondent no. 4, who shall look into the same and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U