Guncha Rani @ Rafat Jahan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64388 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2024 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Guncha Rani @ Rafat Jahan W/O Reyaz Ahmad @ Raiyaz Ahmad Resident of Village- Nullah Hlim Kha, Police Station- Lahariasarai, DistrictDarbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 341, 323, 324, 308, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted carry punishment of seven years and less. It is further submitted that police during the course of investigation gave notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. to the petitioner and the petitioner during the course of investigation cooperated with the police and the police never felt the need of arresting the petitioner but then charge-sheet came to be submitted based on which cognizance has been taken, thus, petitioner apprehends her arrest. Learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64388 of 2025(2) dt.25-09-2025 2/2 counsel next submits that when police during the course of investigation never felt the need of arresting the petitioner whether it would be prudent for the Court to send the petitioner to jail merely because charge-sheet has been submitted and cognizance taken. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 32 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T