Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54426/2017bail granted

Bishnu Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54426 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54426 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -212 Year- 2017 Thana -MALSALAMI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. BISHNU RAY Son of Sri Munaka Ray, R/o Mohalla- Damriyani Ghat, Patna City, P.S.- Malsalami, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 212 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 54 litres country made wine. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and his name has been disclosed by the co-accused of this case. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 07.09.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54426 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 212 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T