← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56740/2017bail granted

Mukesh Ranjan v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-11-27Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56740 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28479 Year-2014 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Mukesh Ranjan, S/o Rameshwar Prasad Ranjan, resident of MohallaRanibagh Simiri, Bakhtiyarpur, P.S.- Simari, Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Minu Kumari, W/o Mukesh Ranjan, D/o Uday Prasad Bhagat, Present Address Moh- Mohanganj, P.S.- Tarapur, District- Munger, presently C/o Sanjeev Kumar, Moh- Purnendu Nagar, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. RAM ANURAG SINGH, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 341, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56740 of 2017(2) dt.27-11-2017 2/2 petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Patna in connection with Complaint case No.28479 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T