Shekh Sattar @ Mannu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64876 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2025 Thana- MANIHARI District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.
Shekh Sattar @ Mannu S/O Late Tameej @ Late Shekh Tameej Resident of Village - Chit Boliya, ward no-1,PS - Manihari,District-Katihar 2.
Bibi Rukhsana W/O Shekh Sattar @ Mannu Resident of Village - Chit Boliya, ward no-1,PS - Manihari,District-Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate Mr. Harish Chandra Patel, Advocate Ms. Isha Mishra, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 333, 118(1), 109, 76, 189(2), 191(2) and 303(2) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 02.07.2025 at about 7:30 AM, all the F.I.R named accused persons, including these petitioners, armed with deadly
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64876 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 weapons, entered into house of informant and Petitioner No. 1 assaulted on the head of husband of informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that there is absolutely no allegation of overt act against Petitioner No. 2. There is case and counter-case. Doctor has opined the injuries, sustained by the injured, as simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Katihar in connection with Manihari P.S. Case No. 177 of 2025, subject to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64876 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T