Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65831 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2025 Thana- Gurupa District- Gaya ====================================================== Pramod Kumar S/O Sitaram Prasad @ Sitaram Yadav R/O village- Lodhwe Tola Kodeya, PS- Gurpa, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gurpa P.S.Case No. 36 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition& Excise Amendment Act.
3. The recovery is of 150 liters Mahua liquor from the Motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he is in custody since 03.08.2025. The petitioner has claimed clean antecedent.
5. The learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the fact and circumstances of the case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65831 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 and submissions of the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/ successor court in connection with Gurapa P.S.Case No. 36 of 2025.
7. This is also subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- in Ramakrishna Mission Sevashrama, Swami Vevekananda Path, Bela, Muzaffarpur, Bihar and produced the receipt of the same before the court below. The bail bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted after verifying the genuineness of the receipt produced by the petitioner.
8. As the petitioner claims to have clean antecedent, the court below, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner is directed to verify the antecedent of the petitioner. If the petitioner is found to be involved in any other cases then the bail bonds of the petitioner shall not be accepted. (Sandeep Kumar, J) N.K/- U T