Kashi Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.56245 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2015 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ====================================================== Kashi Ram, Son of Late Swaroop Ram, resident of Vilage- Gehuma Bairiya, P.S.- Phulparas, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ratanakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. SRI BAL MUKUND PRASAD SINHA ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected thrice vide order dated 21.01.2016, 31.08.2016 and 28.06.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 54131 of 2015, 34951 of 2016 and 17030 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 21.04.2015, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, the allegations are general and omnibus in nature and co-accused Ashok Ram has already been allowed bail and further co-accused Jang Bahadur Ram has also been allowed bail by another co-ordinate Benches of this Court and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. The trial has not been concluded within four months and the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer of bail.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56245 of 2017(2) dt.22-11-2017 2/2 Learned APP submits that the doctor has found multiple injury on the person of the deceased.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of custody and further that the trial has not been concluded and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Phulparas P. S. Case No. 54 of 2015, G. R. No. 312 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T