Raman Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64540 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2020 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Raman Sahu Son Of Jitan Sahu R/O Village- Hrishawara, Ward No.12, P.S.- Khajauli, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 21-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, leaned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(B), 379, 448, 380, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, informant alleged that when he forbade accused persons including petitioner to encroach his land then they assaulted the informant by means of farsa, due to which he sustained head injury. It is further alleged that the petitioner also tried to outrage the modesty of informant's mother and other co-accused snatched Mangal Sutra and cash from them.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Both the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64540 of 2022(2) dt.21-02-2023 2/2 parties are agnates and a land dispute is going on between the parties due to which the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. As per the injury report, doctor opined that injuries sustained by injured are simple in nature and the same has been annexed as Annexure-2. He has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 13.09.2022. Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 133 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. Ist Class, Madhubani, Dist.-Madhubani.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Aman/Manish U T