Md. Sallauddin @ Salluddin And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53245 of 2016 (2) dt.08-12-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.53245 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -220 Year- 2016 Thana -SUPAUL District- SUPAUL ======================================================
1. Md. Sallauddin @ Salluddin,
2. Md. Mohiuddin,
3. Md. Sakoor,
4. Md. Gafoor, all 1 to 4 are son of Md. Gul Mohammad @ Najir, resident of village- Parsoni Punarbash, P.O.- Bakor, P.S.- Supaul, DistrictSupaul. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 220 of 2016 registered under Sections 302 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation of informant, Majida Khatoon, is that her daughter, Jamjam Khatoon, who was suffering from Polio, fallen in love with Md. Sadarul and become pregnant. Thereafter, Panchayati was arranged and marriage was performed but the father and mother of Sadarul did not take her daughter to their house. Thereafter, after operation, a child was found dead. On 19.04.2016, her son-in-law talked with his wife on mobile and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53245 of 2016 (2) dt.08-12-2016 called her behind the IDGAH, on which, her daughter went to the IDGAH but she did not return. Thereafter, dead body of her daughter was found in a room of cattle hospital. The informant raised suspicion against her son-in-law and other family members having hand in the murder of her daughter.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that daughter of informant had never visited at her Sasural house and the petitioners, who are brother of the husband of the deceased, has falsely been implicated in this case mere on suspicion. It is further submitted at bar that the husband of the deceased is in custody.
Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 220 of 2016, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T