← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16147/2017disposed

Mukesh Kumar Maurya v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-13The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16147 of 2017 ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Maurya, Son of Ramashish Maurya, Resident of Village- Tali, P.S.- Guthni, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise, Prohibition & Registration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Siwan.

3. The Superintendent of Excise, Siwan.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Siwan.

5. The Officer In charge, Marwan Police Station, Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha - GA - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 13-11-2017 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (Bolero Pick Up) bearing Registration No. BR 29GA0929, which has been seized in connection with Mairwa P.S. Case No. 186/2017 due to violation of the Excise Act. The prayer made in the writ petition is to release the vehicle in question pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case.

It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on

Patna High Court CWJC No.16147 of 2017(2) dt.13-11-2017 2/2 various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending finalization of the aforesaid confiscation proceedings and criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner on his furnishing surety bonds to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Siwan and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the District Magistrate, Siwan and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- U