Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68381/2025dismissed

Vikram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68381 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2024 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vikram Kumar Son of Ramu Patel Resident of Mohalla - Miscout, P.S. - Motihari Town, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prateek Tandon For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 434 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on 15.05.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 31119 of 2025 which reads as follows:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Town P.S. Case No.434 of 2024, registered for the offences under Sections 309(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68381 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 Sanhita and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3. Unknown criminals looted Rs.8 Lakhs and a motorcycle from the informant who was going to deposit the same in the office of Flipkart. The informant was shot by the accused persons. One Subhash Kumar was arrested and Rs.30,000/- was recovered from him and he disclosed the name of the petitioner in his self inculpatory statement.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 20.12.2024 and he has two criminal antecedents.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and criminal antecedent of the petitioner in similar nature of offence, this application is dismissed.

4. This Court finds no ground to review its earlier order. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands rejected.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T