Shashi Bhushan Ranjan @ Bhushan Ranjan v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18232 of 2024 ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Ranjan @ Bhushan Ranjan Son of Sheo Bachan Prasad @ Sheo Bachan Ram Permanent Resident of Village- Kathkauliya, P.O.- Marojhiya, P.S.- Nasariganj, District- Rohtas, at Present R/o-C/o Jitendra Kumar, Gopal Prasad Rupaspur, Near Chamtoli, Ganganagar Colony, P.S.- Rupaspur, District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of India 2.

All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi through its Director, New Delhi.

3.

The Medical Council of India through its President, New Delhi. 4.

Dr. Milind Padmakar Hote, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Sr. Panel Counsel ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-12-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the concerned respondent authority to inquire into the complaint made by the petitioner against Dr. Milind Padmakar Hote who was then posted at All India Institute Medical Science, Delhi (AIIMS) after seizing the CCTV footage and all other relevant documents as due to

Patna High Court CWJC No.18232 of 2024(2) dt.04-12-2024 2/2 negligence of the doctor and his team the only son of the petitioner namely, Karan Raj aged about two years died during treatment.

(ii) For further directing the concerned respondent to take disciplinary and legal action against Dr. Milind Padmakar Hote and his team, whose negligence has caused the death of the only son of the petitioner so that in future no death occurs due to such negligent act."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the competent Court having appropriate jurisdiction over the subject matter of the present case and/or the respondent authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U