← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3105/2025withdrawn

Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-31Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3105 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4485 of 2025 ====================================================== Sanjay Yadav Son of Lakhan Mahto, Resident of Village Pachrukhi Aajimchak, PS Akbarpur, District Nawada, Bihar 805126. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. Amrit Lal Meena, The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Mr. Dinesh Kumar Ray, The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Mr. Arvind Kr. Chaudhary, The Additional Secretary-cum-Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

Mr. Vinay Kumar, The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Mr. A.N. Safina, The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya. 6.

Mr. Ram Prkash, The District Magistrate, District- Nawada. 7.

Mr. Abhinath Tiwari, The Superintendent of Police, District- Nawada. 8.

Mr. Sobran Kumar Sarma, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Rajauli, DistrictNawada. 9.

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, The Circle Officer, Akbarpur Block, District- Nawada. 10.

Mr. Sanjeet Ram, The S.H.O., Akbarpur Police Station, District- Nawada. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, S.C. 25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, learned S.C.-25 for the State assisted by Mr. Ram Pravesh Nath Tiwari, learned Advocate.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the contempt application as it has been submitted that the order dated 15.04.2025 in C.W.J.C. No. 4485 of 2025 stands complied.

Patna High Court MJC No.3105 of 2025(7) dt.31-07-2026 2/2

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. The personal appearance of the Circle Officer is dispensed with.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U