Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2778/2016dismissed

Rajan Kumar Verma v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-03-30Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2778 of 2016 ====================================================== Rajan Kumar Verma son of Sri S.N. Tetarway, Resident of D-54 Rajeev Nagar, Bampur Ca Begampur, New Delhi- 86, Permanent resident of Mohalla- Shivpur, Post Office- Mahendru, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Richa Anand, Daughter of Anil Kumar Ambastha, Resident of SRT- 27, Rajendra Nagar, Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-03-2016 The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 23.09.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 45335 of 2015 and thereby grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 159 of 2011. The factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner being the husband of the informant was granted provisional anticipatory bail for one year vide order dated 24.01.2013 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 48431 of 2012 on the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to keep the informant as wife with full dignity and honour. The provisional bail of the petitioner was to confirm by learned court below if the matrimonial harmony is substantially restored or if the informant

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2778 of 2016 (2) dt.30-03-2016 2/2 deliberately refuses to reside with the petitioner. But since the matrimonial harmony could not be restored, hence, modification application was filed vide Cr. Misc. No. 45335 of 2015 but the same was disposed of since for modification of the order dated 24.01.2013 modification application was filed on 21.09.2015 much after lapse of period of provisional bail of one year granted to the petitioner, however, in view of this Court if the petitioner surrenders it is a case for consideration of regular bail. Hence, this Court finds no merit in the present modification application.

Accordingly, the present modification application is disposed of.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra/- U T