Irshad Ansari @ Irshad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59727 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2019 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN District- Gopalganj ====================================================== IRSHAD ANSARI @ IRSHAD Son of Qyamuddin Ansari @ Qyamuddin @ Kayamuddin Resident of Village- Semara Purab Tola, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Informant Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant.

The petitioner in the present case is seeking regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 353 of 2019 arising out of Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 64 of 2019 registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 325, 307, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge - VIII, Gopalganj.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. Both sides are agnates and both sides have sustained injury. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59727 of 2019(3) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 inflicted Khanti blow on the head of the deceased i.e. daughter of the informant.

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail and submit that petitioner has given Khanti blow on the head of the deceased who is daughter of the informant.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein the specific allegation against the petitioner is that he had given Khanti blow on the head of the deceased and as per the post-mortem report that allegation find corroborated and the impugned orders shows that in the inquest report paragraph 3, head injury has been found which led to death of the deceased and the petitioner has gone in custody on 25.03.2019, this court is not inclined to grant privilege of regular bail to the petitioner. Prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is refused. Let the trial of this case be expedited.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U T