Patna High CourtCWJC/12669/2018disposed

Mahendra Kumar Bharti v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-12Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal2 pages

2018IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12669 of 2018 ====================================================== Mahendra Kumar Bharti, Son of Late Kashi Nath Bharti, resident of VillagePanchgawan, P.S. Semr ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Accountant General, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

4. The District Provident Fund Officer, Samastipur.

5. The Circle Officer, Samastipur.

6. The General Secretary, Admistration Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Mukul Prasad, A.C. to G.P.-18 For the Accountant General Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 12-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

Petitioner, who retired on 30.11.2016 claims for payment of his post retiral benefits with statutory interest as it is submitted that no amount of retiral benefits has been paid. Learned counsel for the State submits that in pursuance to the order dated 01.11.2018 passed by this Court, the petitioner had filed fresh form and submitted it to the office of DCLR, Samastipur but it wrongly went to the office of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.12669 of 2018(7) dt.12-12-2018 2/2 Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

Learned counsel for the State is directed to call for the forms from the office of the Accountant General and after verifying the same send to the office of the Accountant General Bihar, Patna for preparation of PPO in favour of the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Any admissible amount due to the petitioner, would be paid to the petitioner within a month, thereafter.

The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations.

(Nilu Agrawal, J) sudha/- U