Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69374 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Deepak Kumar, S/o Nagendra Mahto, Resident of Village- Sonbarsa, P.S.- Sonbarsa, Dist.- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahendra Thakur, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sitamarhi Cyber P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318 (4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 111(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66, 66(C ), and 66(D) of the I.T. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant reached in the premises of Reasoning Circle, Sitamarhi which looked like a call center and when the informant entered, he found that certain persons were working on the system and fine wise pioneer was opened in different tabs. They were editing the photographs. It is further alleged that certain boys were abusing and threatening for loan recovery. The informant found the work to be suspicious. They were apprehended. Petitioner is one

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69374 of 2025(2) dt.25-09-2025 2/2 amongst them.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no complain against him and no incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. Only a laptop was recovered from his possession. It has also been submitted that this case is triable by learned Judicial Magistrate. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 16.04.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi Cyber P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T