Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.56201 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2017 Thana -TANDWA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Sonu Kumar, Son of Vira Paswan, Resident of Village-Ekhara, P.S.- Tandwa, District-Aurangabad. (Bihar).
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Leelawati Kumari, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Tandwa P.S. Case No. 55 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 447, 448, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the informant with Danda on her head.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner and informant are own Gotiya and there is land dispute between the parties.
The injury report of the informant has been enclosed as Annexure-2 wherein the Doctor has found simple injury on the person of the informant.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56201 of 2017 (2) dt.29-11-2017 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 55 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.