Shakeela Parveen v. The State Of Bihar Through The Home Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2285 of 2025 ====================================================== Shakeela Parveen Daughter of Dr. Abdul Gafoor Resident of villageIndrapuri Samanpura Colony, Raja Bazar, PS- Shastri Nagar District -Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna Bihar 2.

The Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna 4.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Patna 6.

The Officer-in-Charge, Shastri Nagar Ps, Patna 7.

The Director General of Police, Haryana, Haryana Police headquarters, Sector 6, Panchkula, Haryana 134108 8.

Officer-in-charge Cyber Crime Ps, Sector 8, District Kurukshetra, Haryana ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harsh Singh, Advocate Mr. Abhijeet, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 13-02-2026 The present writ application has been filed for the following reliefs:

i) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus thereby directing the Respondents to produce before the Hon'ble Court Petitioner's son, namely, Fahad Hamza, s/o Shakeel Najmi, r/o 2 E, Namaskar Enclave, P.S. Patliputra, District Patna, currently residing with the Petitioner at Petitioner's address at Indrapuri,

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2285 of 2025(5) dt.13-02-2026 2/2 Samanpura Colony, Raja Bazar, P.S. Shastri Nagar, District Patna, who has been arrested and detained by the Respondents in gross violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India.

ii) To any other relief or reliefs for which the Petitioner is found entitled to in facts and circumstances of the case.

2. During the course of arguments, it has been brought to the notice of this Court that in compliance with the order dated 04.09.2025, the detenue has already been released.

3. In view of the fact that the detenue has already been released, the question of illegal confinement/custody no longer survives for consideration.

4. Accordingly, the present writ application stands disposed of.

5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, J) ( Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Anushka/- U