← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1122/2018dismissed

Rubiya Katoon And ANR v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govern

2018-09-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1122 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17657 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Rubiya Katoon, Daughter of Md. Nizamuddin, resident of Village- Bagaucha, Police Station- Maharajganj, District- Siwan. At present posted and working as a Panchayat Teacher in Govt. Primary Maktab Satjora, Block- Daraunda, District- Siwan.

2. Rukhsar Jahan, Daughter of Md. Afzal Hussain, Wife of Gulam Ahmad Rabbani, resident of Mohalla- Mohan Bazar, Police Station- Maharajganj, District- Siwan. At present posted and working as a Panchayat Teacher in Govt. Primary Maktab Satjora, Block- Daraunda, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Mr. R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Mr. Ramchandra Tuddu, the Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Mahendra Kumar, the District Magistrate, Siwan.

4. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Rai, the District Education Officer, Siwan.

5. Mr. Amerika Prasad, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan.

6. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Daraunda, DistrictSiwan.

7. Mr. Ajay Kumar, the Block Education Officer, Daraunda, District- Siwan.

8. Mr. Ajay Kumar the Drawing Disbursing-cum- Block Education Officer, Daraunda, District- Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey - Aag 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 19-09-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that against the decision of the opposite parties, he has already filed writ petition.

In view of the above, there is no point to proceed any further in the present contempt application.

Accordingly, it is dropped.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U