Tej Pratap @ Tej Pratap Yadav @ Dollar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65423 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2024 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Tej Pratap @ Tej Pratap Yadav @ Dollar S/o Sanjay Rai @ Sanjay Kumar R/o Village- Rupaspur, PS- Rupaspur, Dist- Patna, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Sristy Patel, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2025
1. Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 448, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, later on Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added.
3. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that this is the third attempt of the petitioner to seek regular bail. It is next submitted that earlier the petitioner had moved before this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.81829/2024 and the same was rejected by an order dated
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65423 of 2025(3) dt.19-09-2025 2/3 20.12.2024, thereafter again the petitioner moved before this court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.27162/2025 and the same was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge by an order dated 25.04.2025. It is next submitted that charges against the petitioner stands framed by an order dated 25.08.2025. The said submission of the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-VII, Danapur (Patna), in connection with S. Tr. No.1122/2025 (arising out of Rupaspur P.S. Case No.208/2024).
5. Further, one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his cousin uncle, namely, Ranjeet Kumar.
6. It is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65423 of 2025(3) dt.19-09-2025 3/3 to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reason. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T