Shankar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58150 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2017 Thana -BANDIYA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Shankar Yadav, Son of Kamla Yadav, Resident of village- Bhikhanpur, P.O.- Sarwahda, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Bohra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bandeya P.S. Case No.12 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 353, 385, 427, 435, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of CLA Act.

It has been submitted that the F.I.R. is lodged against unknown. The name of this petitioner has been disclosed during investigation in confessional statement of co-accused Saryu Ram which also finds mention in the impugned order. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, namely above, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58150 of 2017 (2) dt.19-12-2017 2/2 six weeks from today, in connection with Bandeya P.S. Case No.12 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, subject to the conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) N.H./- U T