Naveen Kumar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14700 of 2024 ====================================================== 1 .
Naveen Kumar Tiwari Son of Shri Ravindra Nath Tiwari Resident of Village- Bhagwati Nagar, Bettiah, Police Station - Bettiah, District - West Champaran.
2.
Kumari Pratima, Wife of Late Ajay Shankar Pandey, Resident of Village - Kotwali Chowk, Police Station-Bettiah, District- West Champaran. 3 .
Arvind Kumar Pandey, Son of Late Shobha Kant Pandey, Resident of Village- Majharia, Police Station- Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran. 4.
Surendra Kumar Tiwari, Son of Late Hari Shanker Tiwari, Resident of Village- Panchrukhia, Police Station - Ram Nagar, District - West Champaran.
5 .
Narendra Kumar Thakur, Son of Shri Jai Mohan Thakur, Resident of Village- Barharba, Police Station- Sirisia, District- West Champaran. 6.
Nand Kishore Mishra, Son of Late Mahendra Mishra, Resident of VillageKehunia, Police Station - Shikarpur, District - West Champaran. 7.
Rakesh Ranjan Chaturvedi, Son of Shri Braj Kishore Chaturvedi, Resident of Village - Satbaria, Police Station- Sathi, District- West Champaran. 8 .
Kamakhya Narayan Choubey, Son of Late Ishwar Chandra Choubey, Resident of Village - Satbaria, Police Station - Sathi, District - West Champaran.
9.
Manoj Kumar Mani Tripathi, Son of Sri Bhuneshwar Mani Tripathi, Resident of Village- Bakultahar Math, Police Station- Gopalpur, DistrictWest Champaran. 10 . Sudama Sah, Son of Late Ram Awatar Sah, Resident of Village- Tengerahia, Police Station-Gopalpur, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna 3 .
The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.
The Special Director, Secondary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5 .
The District Education Officer, West Champaran 6.
The District Programme Officer, Establishment, West Champaran 7.
The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna 8 .
The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
Patna High Court CWJC No.14700 of 2024(3) dt.28-11-2024 2/3 For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hemant Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Government Advocate (10) Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav , AC to GA 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This writ application has been filed for commanding the respondents to make payment of arrears by way of differential amount of salary in the revised pay-scale under 5th, 6th and 7th Pay Revision in the same manner as allowed to the teaching and non teaching staffs of the Government Schools together with Dearness Allowance admissible thereon as has been directed by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 and analogous cases, vide order dated 13.08.2019.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that case of the petitioners is fully covered with the order/judgment of this Court dated 13.08.2019 passed in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 and other analogous cases. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that pursuant to aforesaid order/judgment of L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016, several orders have been passed by Hon'ble Single Benches of this Court.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the contention made on behalf of the petitioners
5. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, this
Patna High Court CWJC No.14700 of 2024(3) dt.28-11-2024 3/3 writ application is disposed of with direction to the petitioners to approach the respondents authorities (respondent no. 6) in the light of order/judgment of this Court dated 13.08.2019 passed in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 by way of filing a detailed representation(s) alongwith copy of order passed in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 before the concerned respondent within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt / production of copy of this order. If such representation is filed, the concerned respondent shall dispose of the same preferably within a period of ten weeks thereafter after hearing the parties in accordance with law.
6. It goes without saying that if the claim of the petitioners is found admissible by the concerned respondent, he shall ensure that the admissible amount must be paid to the petitioners as early as possible.
7. With above observation and direction, the writ application stands disposed of.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U