Jai Narayan Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14451 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Jai Narayan Mishra Son of Late Upendradat Mishra Resident of Village - Satwaria, Police Station-Sathi, District - West Champaran. 2.

Braj Kishore Chaturvedi, Son of Late Ramashray Chaubey, Resident of Village- Satwaria, Police Station Sathi, District- West Champaran. 3.

Uma Kant Tiwary, Son of Late Ramjee Tiwari, Resident of Village Bakulhar, Police Station - Gopalpur, District - West Champaran. 4.

Shridhar Pandey, Son of Late Ram Parsan Pandey, Resident of Village - Kila Mohalla, Police Station-Bettiah, District - West Champaran. 5.

Omravati Devi, Wife of Late Ram Chandra Shukla, Resident of Village - Behra, Police Station - Sikta, District - West Champaran. 6.

Satish Kumar Pandey, Son of Late Chandrika Pandey, Resident of Village Pingra, Police Station - Deoriya, District - Deoriya. 7.

Raj Mangal Pathak, Son of Late Mohan Pathak, Resident of Village Sasaula Kala, Police Station - Suppi, District - Sitamarhi. 8.

Arvind Kumar Mishra, Son of Late Surya Narayan Mishra, Resident of Village Narayanpur Ghat, Police Station Pathkhauli, District - West Champaran.

9.

Mithilesh Devi, Wife of Late Tarkeshwar Prasad Srivastava, Resident of Village - Suhagi, Police Station - Kushhar, District - Sheohar. 10.

Sharda Devi, Wife of Late Vishwanath Prasad, Resident of Village- Berbas, Police Station-Sitamarhi, District - Sitamarhi. 11.

Harendra Mohan Thakur, Son of Late Jai Mohan Thakur, Resident of Village- Bulaki, Police Station- Bettiah, District- West Champaran. 12.

Anand Kumar Pandey, Son of Late Jhontil Pandey, Resident of Village Aberaiya, Police Station - Banuchhapar, District - West Champaran. 13.

Jitendra Kumar Srivastava, Son of Late Sukdeo Prasad, Resident of Village - Sugaon, Police Station - Sugauli, District - West Champaran. 14.

Chandra Bhushan Singh, Son of Late Ram Bhagwan Singh, Resident of Village- Madhubani, Police Station- Bagaha, District- West Champaran. 15.

Raghav Sharan Mishra, Son of Tirthraj Mishra, Resident of Village Hiranhi, Police Station - Jatha Bazar, District - Kushinagar. 16.

Awadh Kumar Upadhyay, Son of Late Ram Kumar Upadhyay, Resident of Village- Bagaha, Police- Station Bagaha, District- West Champaran. 17.

Meera Devi, Wife of Late Krishna Prasad Chaubey, Resident of VillageBishrampur, Police Station-Yogapatti, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

2/4 1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Special Director, Secondary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The District Education Officer, West Champaran. 6.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, West Champaran. 7.

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna. 8.

The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hemant Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Advocate General For the BSSB :

Mr. S.S. Sundaram, Advocate Mr. Ankit, Advocate Mr. Chandan Shekhar Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 14-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and respondents.

2. This writ application has been filed for commanding the respondents to make payment of arrears by way of differential amount of salary in the revised pay-scale under 5th, 6th and 7th Pay Revision in the same manner as allowed to the teaching and non-teaching staffs of the Government Schools together with Dearness Allowance admissible thereon as has been directed by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 and analogous cases, vide order dated

3/4 13.08.2019.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that case of the petitioners is fully covered with the order/judgment of this Court dated 13.08.2019 passed in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 and other analogous cases (Annexure P/1).

4. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the contention made on behalf of the petitioners.

5. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with direction to the petitioners to approach the respondents authorities in the light of order/judgment of this Court dated 13.08.2019 passed in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 by way of filing a detailed representation(s) alongwith copy of order passed in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 before the concerned respondent within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt / production of copy of this order. If such representation is filed, the concerned respondent shall dispose of the same preferably within a period of ten weeks thereafter after hearing the parties in accordance with law.

6. It goes without saying that if the claim of the petitioners is found admissible by the concerned respondent, he shall ensure that the admissible amount must be paid to the petitioners as early as possible.

4/4

7. With above observation and direction, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 20.11.2024 Transmission Date N/A