Ramadhar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57239 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -191 Year- 2017 Thana -GHOSI District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Ramadhar Singh, son of late Munilal Singh

2. Partima Devi, wife of Ramadhar Singh Both resident of village Kewali, P.S. Ghoshi, Distt. Jehanabad.

3. Babita @ Bibha Kumari @ Babita Devi, wife of Sanjay Singh, resident of village Jalhara, P.S. Bodh Gaya, Distt. Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 191 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that mere suspicion has been raised against these petitioners in the written report.

The victim girl on her recovery has given statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. wherein she has specifically stated that she has married with Sonu and he is her husband. She has not levelled any allegation of overt act against these petitioners.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57239 of 2017 (2) dt.06-12-2017 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 191 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T