Bhukal Sahni @ Amit Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63723 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2025 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Bhukal Sahni @ Amit Sahni Son of Yogendra Sahni R/o Vill. - Pannapur Yogiya, P.S. - Harsiddhi, Dist. - East Champaran(Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 308 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 317(4), 317(5) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner fraudulently exchanged the informant's ATM card and on search, multiple ATM cards were recovered from him. Another victim alleged that the petitioner had earlier withdrawn Rs. 37,000/- from his account.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63723 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. It is next submitted that the allegation of withdrawal of Rs. 37,000/- is wholly unsupported by any documentary evidence. It is further submitted that the petitioner and informant are resident of same locality and due to previous enmity, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 27.06.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 308 of 2025 (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T