← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19061/2019disposed

Vinita Devi @ Beenita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-25Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19061 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinita Devi @ Beenita Kumari Resident of village- Madhepura, P.o.- Amma, P.s.- Hathauri, Block- Katra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary Child and Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The District Magistrate Muzaffarpur 4.

The District Programme Officer Muzaffarpur 5.

The Block Development Officer Katra, Muzaffarpur 6.

The Child Development Project Officer Katra, Katra, Muzaffarpur 7.

Juhi Kumari W/o Rajeev Kumar Resident of village- Madhepura, P.o.- Amma, Block- Katra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs.Sanjana For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Binay Kumar, Ac to SC-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-10-2019 The petitioner has grievance against selection of respondent No. 7 as Anganbari Sevika at Anganbari Centre Code No. 221, Ward No. 15 in the district of Muzaffarpur. The petitioner claims that she had better rights to be selected against the said post than respondent No.7.

The petitioner has remedy of appeal before the authority under the guidelines laying down process of selection and service conditions of Anganbari Sevika/Sahayika under Integrated Child Development Services.

This application is accordingly disposed of with

Patna High Court CWJC No.19061 of 2019(2) dt.25-10-2019 2/2 observation that the petitioner shall be at liberty to prefer complaint/appeal before appropriate authority, raising her grievance as has been raised in the present writ application. It is indicated that if any complaint/appeal is filed within one month from today, no objection of delay in filing appeal shall be taken by the competent authority since the petitioner was pursuing her remedy before this Court by filing the present writ application. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U