Ankit Kumar @ Sunny @ Sunni v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48851 of 2015 (3) dt.28-01-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48851 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -186 Year- 2015 Thana -DAUDNAGAR District- AURANGABAD ======================================================
1. ANKIT KUMAR @ SUNNY @ SUNNI Son of Ranjeet Sharma, Resident of Village -Kanap, P.S. - Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B. N. Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in connection withDaudnagar P.S. Case No. 186 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. Acting on a tip off that some persons have assembled to commit murder, raid was conducted and then the petitioner and other co-accused were apprehended and from possession of the petitioner one loaded country made pistol with live cartridge and mobile were recovered.
Submission is of false implication and that no offence under Section 307 IPC is made out and the petitioner is suffering
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48851 of 2015 (3) dt.28-01-2016 in custody since 02.08.2015 having no criminal antecedent. Mr. B. N. Pandey, learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named shall be released on bail after completion of six months in judicial custody from the date of his remand on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 186 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T