← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49201/2015rejected

Jagarnath Singh @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

2015-11-05Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49201 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -52 Year- 2015 Thana -NALANDA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Jagarnath Singh @ Sonu Son of Radha Krishna Singh Resident of village - Bhaore Bigha, P.S. Sare, District - Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan(Spl.App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 05-11-2015 Heard counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dayal APP for the State.

The petitioner herein depicted as one of the accused(s) in Nalanda P.S. Case No. 52 of 2015 registered under sections 307 IPC and section 3(i) & (x) of SC/ST Act, later section 302 was added, has filed the present application for grant of anticipatory bail. The allegation, in brief, is that when the informant entered into her rented room the accused persons Radha Krishna Singh along with his two sons including the petitioner came with Lathi(s) and assaulted the informant, and her two sons. Subsequently, one of the sons of the informant namely Pankaj Kumar succumbed to his injury.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49201 of 2015 (2) dt.05-11-2015 2/2 The contention of the petitioner is that the sister of the petitioner subsequently lodged a complaint relating to the same date and time of occurrence narrating that the two sons of the informant entered into her room and tried to sexually assault her. Referring to injury report, it is submitted that only one injury has been found on the person of the deceased.

Be that as it may, considering the seriousness of the offence and the manner in which it was committed, I am not persuaded to privilege the petitioner with anticipatory bail. The prayer is rejected. He should surrender and pray for regular bail in the court below.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U T