Sunil Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2534 of 2017 ====================================================== Sunil Sharma, S/o Ram Vijay Singh, Resident of Village - Dharnai, P.S. - Makhdumpur, District - Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Director General of Police-cum-Inspector General of Police ,Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Co-operative Society, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Registrar, Co-operative Society, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Socieyt, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Magadh Range, Gaya, Bihar.

7. The District Magistrate, Jehanabad.

8. The Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad.

9. The District Co-operative Officer, Jehanabad.

10. The Block Co-operative Extension Officer, Makhdumpur, District - Jehanabad.

11. The S.H.O. Makhdumpur Police Station, Jehanabad.

12. M/S Maharani Rice Mills, Koylee through its proprietor, Mageshwari Sinha Son of Kamta Prasad Resident of Village - Koylee, P.S. - Makhdumpur, District - Jehanabad.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amit Prakash ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 04-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The kind of relief sought for by the petitioner in the present criminal writ application cannot be considered for the simple reason that what was directed by the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Society, Government of Bihar (respondent no.5) cannot be examined and adjudicated by this Court sitting in

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.2534 of 2017 (2) dt.04-01-2018 a criminal writ jurisdiction.

Petitioner is an accused in Makhdumpur P.S. Case No.197 of 2016 dated 04.08.2016 registered under Section 409/34 of the Indian Penal Code and he wants withdrawal of the said case by stopping the further investigation and enquiry in the matter. The writ application is totally misconceived and this Court is not inclined to exercise its extra-ordinary jurisdiction in the facts and circumstances of the case.

The writ application is dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U T