Prashant Rai @ Prashant Ram @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67158 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1199 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE District- Begusarai ====================================================== PRASHANT RAI @ PRASHANT RAM @ SONU son of Ganesh Ram village- Jai Prakash Nagar Arsande Ps- Kanke Dist- Ranchi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Kalpana Anand wife of Prashant Rai @ Prashant Ram @ Sonu village- Jai Prakash Nagar Arsande Ps- Kanke Dist- Ranchi ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Ms. Diksha Kumari, Advocates.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1199 ©/2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 504, 379, 307, 498(A), 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. Petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no 2., is said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67158 of 2023(4) dt.09-04-2024 2/3 dowry demand.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182.
5. However, the petitioner is ready to give Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand) per month to opposite party no. 2 in the first week of every month. It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order passed in matrimonial maintenance case or any other collateral proceeding. If the petitioner fails to give the aforesaid amount on three consecutive dates to opposite party no.2, his bail bond shall automatically be cancelled.
6. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, under instruction, submits that opposite party no.2 undertakes to provide her bank account details to the petitioner within a period of two weeks by submitting the same on affidavit before the learned court below.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67158 of 2023(4) dt.09-04-2024 3/3
7. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Begusarai where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1199 ©/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
8. If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.
9. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) perwez U T