Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59689 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2019 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== SUNIL YADAV Son of Dwarika Yadav Resident of Village - Kurhila, P.S.- Gidhaur, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dashrath Mehta,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner in the present case is seeking regular bail in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 102 of 2019 registered under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Jamui.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in this case due to local politics and no incriminating articles were recovered from his possession. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail submits that petitioner was arrested and from his possession one country made pistol and live cartridge have been recovered and as many as nine cases of serious nature is on the head of this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59689 of 2019(3) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein this petitioner has been arrested while he was trying to flee away and from his possession one country made pistol and live cartridge have been recovered from his pocket as also that he has as many as nine cases of serious nature on his head, finding that the petitioner seems to be a habitual offender and releasing him on bail is likely to terrorize the public at large in the society, I am not inclined to grant privilege of regular bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is refused. Let the trial of this case be expedited.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U T