Urmila Devi @ Urmila Kumari And Others v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.53051 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -62 Year- 2015 Thana -SC/ST P.S. District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Urmila Devi @ Urmila Kumari
2. Kaushal Kishore Singh @ Komal Kishore Singh,
3. Shashi Bhushan Singh.
4. Bhola Singh.
5. Umesh Singh @ Umesh Kumar Singh.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan(Spl.Pp) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-11-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 147 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (I) (X)(XI) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
The prosecution case is that the informant went to the house of petitioner no.1, Urmila Devi @ Urmila Kumari who is the Headmistress of the school for getting the amount with regard to Dress Scheme but he was being abused by petitioner no.1 and thereafter the husband and other family members including the petitioners abused the informant by calling caste name. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there was no occasion for the informant to go to the house of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53051 of 2015 (2) dt.23-11-2015 2/2 petitioner no.1. Moreover, the money with regard to Dress Scheme has already been given to the informant. Petitioner no.1 lodged Marhawran P.S. Case No. 327 of 2015 on 04.09.2015 levelling accusation under Sections 147, 341, 323, 353, 354, 379, 504 and 506 of the IPC against Sunil Singh and others hence Sunil Singh set up his domestic help to lodge the present case. Admittedly, the occurrence took place in the house of the petitioner no.1 which cannot be treated to be a place of public view. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., IX, Saran in connection with Saran SC/ST P.S. Case No. 62 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra/- U T