← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1171/2018disposed

Helal Ahmad Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-21Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1171 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7714 of 2016 ====================================================== Helal Ahmad Khan Son of Late Hadi Ali Khan, resident of VillageNagarbasti Bahadurganj, Police Station- Warisnagar, District- Samastipur. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director General of Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Patna. 4.

The Director Primary and Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

6.

The District Provident Fund Officer, Samastipur. 7.

The District Education Officer, Samastipur.

8.

The District Superintendent of Education Officer, Samastipur. 9.

The Treasury Officer, Samastipur.

10.

The Block Education Officer, Waris Nagar, District - Samastipur. 11.

The Head Master, State Primary Urdu School, Begumpur, Waris Nagar, District - Samastipur.

12.

The Civil Suregon- cum- Chief Medical Officer, Patna. null null 13.

The Superintendent of Police, Samastipur.

14.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna. null null 15.

The Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, Bihar, Patna. 16.

Rehana Khatoon, Wife of Late Jamal Ahmed, Resident of Ward No. 2, Village - Bahadurganj, Nueganj, Post - Samastipur, Police Station - Waris Nagar, District - Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Raghib Ahsan, Sr. Advocate Mr. Asif Kalim, Advocate Mr. Wasi Akhtar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Singh @ Sanjay, AC to GAXII ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) Date : 21-09-2022

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1171 of 2018 dt.21-09-2022 2/3 The appellant Helal Ahmad Khan who was respondent No. 12 in C.W.J.C No. 7714 of 2016, filed the present Letters Patent Appeal in the year 2018. During pendency of the present L.P.A., appellant has died on 11.11.2020. Thus, appellant's counsel has filed Interlocutory Application for substitution to the appellant. I.A. No. 02 of 2021 Heard Interlocutory Application for substitution.

For the reasons stated in the application and affidavit, I.A. No. 02 of 2021 stands allowed. I.A. No. 01 of 2022 do not survive.

Question for consideration in the present litigation is whether Rehana Khatoon alleged to be wife of late Jamal Ahmad or not? Further whether deceased Helal Ahmed Khan is entitled to monetary benefits on account of death of Jamal Ahmed or not? No doubt, in the service record deceased Jamal Ahmed has nominated Helal Ahmad Khan. At the same time, late Jamal Ahmed is stated to have married Rehana Khatoon and it is disputed by Helal Ahmad Khan. In this regard, civil suit is pending consideration

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1171 of 2018 dt.21-09-2022 3/3 before the jurisdictional civil court. During pendency of the present Letters Patent Appeal, appellant Helal Ahmad Khan died on 11.11.2020, in the result, dead person cannot comply the order of the learned single Judge dated 24.07.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 7714 of 2016. In order to implementation of the aforesaid order of the learned single Judge against legal heirs of Helal Ahmad Khan, the one and only remedy available to the State is to file civil suit against such of those legal heirs of Helal Ahmad Khanappellant. With the above observations the present L.P.A. stands disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Rajiv Roy, J) Rakhi/ Shoaib AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 27.09.2022 Transmission Date