Bibha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58460 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -188 Year- 2017 Thana -LALGANJ District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Bibha Devi, W/o Ranjit Thakur, Resident of Village- Lakhansarai Tej Singh, P.S.- Lalganj District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No.Ii For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Lalganj P.S. Case No. 188 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is Gotani of the deceased.

From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of her arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Lalganj P.S. Case No. 188 of 2017to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58460 of 2017 (2) dt.12-12-2017 2/2 Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T