Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63749/2025bail granted

Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-10Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63749 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2025 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vishal Kumar S/o Shiv Narayan Ram R/o Village - Manikpur, P.S - Harsidhi, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Karandeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 14 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that four unknown miscreants intercepted the informant and on the point of weapon looted Rs. 81,196/- from him and fled away from the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63749 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of self-confession made before the police in Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 108 of 2025 and the same has got no evidentiary value. It is further submitted that no looted article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 28.04.2025 and has got three criminal antecedents.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 14 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T