Patna High CourtCWJC/17298/2017disposed

Sanjay Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-01Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17298 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Sanjay Kumar Son of late Bachchu Singh Resident of Village/P.O.- Bhadokhara, P.S. Mufassil, District- Nawada.

2. Suresh Prasad Singh Son of late Chandeshwar Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Kandha, P.O.- Kachgaon, P.S. Warisaliganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Gaya.

4. The District Magistrate, Nawada.

5. District Primary Teachers Establishment(Promotion) Committee, Nawada through it's Secretary-cum-District- Programme Officer(Establishment), Nawada.

6. The District Education Officer, Nawada.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sidhendra Narayan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy No-1 -Sc13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 01-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already approached the concerned authority by way of filing representation as contained in Annexure-4. He further submits that the matter is pending at the level of District Establishment Committee and as such this court may direct the respondent, District Establishment Committee (respondent no.5) to take final decision on the representation filed

Patna High Court CWJC No.17298 of 2017 (2) dt.01-12-2017 2/2 by the petitioners.

In view of the innocuous prayer made by the writ petitioners, the writ application is disposed of with direction to respondent nos. 4 and 5 to see that the representation is taken to its logical end by a reasoned speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of this order and a copy of the representation. With the aforesaid observation, the application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U