Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 63692 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2025 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Umesh Yadav S/O Late Baldeo Yadav Resident Of Village- Kandi Nawada, P.S.- Chandauti, District- Gaya 2.

Rajesh Yadav S/O Late Baldeo Yadav Resident Of Village- Kandi Nawada, P.S.- Chandauti, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr.Kamal Deo Sharma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Surendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 182 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 74 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have assaulted the informant and his son. It is specifically alleged that petitioner no. 1 namely, Umesh Yadav assaulted the son of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 63692 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from perusal of Annexure-P/3, which is injury report and it will transpire that the nature of injury is simple, caused by hard and blunt substance. He also submits that there is also a counter version of this case. He further submits that the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 24.06.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner no. 1 are having criminal antecedent of one case in which he is on bail, whereas petitioner no. 2 has criminal antecedent of three cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 182 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T