Sangeeta Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64366 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2022 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ====================================================== SANGEETA GUPTA Son of Sri Dineshwar Prasad Resident of MohallaKotwali Chowk, Ganj No.-02, P.S.- Bettiah Town, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ranjiv Kumar Goyal Son of Sri Rajkishore Prasad Barnwal Resident of Mohalla- Naya Bazaar, Purani Gudari, Ward No.-10, P.S.- Bettiah Town(Kalibag O.P.), District- West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Mr. Ramakant Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-03-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 408, 420, 468, 323, 504, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner alongwith other co-accused is involved in misappropriating the amount lent for executing a sale deed in favor of the informant. The petitioner is the witness of the agreement that was executed in favor of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64366 of 2022(3) dt.27-03-2023 2/2 levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. She has been made accused in the present case just because she is the wife of co-accused no.1 and is an witness of the sale deed agreement. He further submits that this matter is of civil dispute between the parties. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as there is a civil dispute between the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No.87 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T