Rajeshwar Singh @ Gama Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69941 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2025 Thana- PALANWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rajeshwar Singh @ Gama Singh Son of Late Vishwanath Singh @ Late Baidhnath Singh R/o Village Gadh Sirisiya, P.S. - Palanwa, Dist. - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subodh Kumar Barnwal, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard Mr. Subodh Kumar Barnwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Palanwa P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B0(a), 25(1(a)(c), 25(i)(1-AA), 25(1)(1-B)(c), 26, 28 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the house of Pankaj Kumar (son of the petitioner), arms were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69941 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/2 this petitioner; rather, he has been framed in this case, as the recovery has been made from the house of his son. It has also been submitted that the petitioner has been separate from his son since 20.07.2020. He further submits that the petitioner has been framed in this case only on the basis that he is the father of the person from whom the recovery has been made. Moreover, petitioner is an old age person and he is languishing in judicial custody since 19.04.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Palanwa P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T