← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64501/2022rejected

Vijay Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-10Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64501 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2022 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gaya ====================================================== VIJAY MANJHI Son of Lalit Manjhi Resident of Village - Rampur Kelra, P.S. - Rampur, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Forest Case No. 27 of 2022 registered under Sections 33, 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is general and omnibus allegation against him. Further submission is that petitioner is not named in the first information report and there is no criminal history against him.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that the vehicle, from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64501 of 2022(2) dt.10-01-2023 2/2 where the alleged recovery has been made, belongs to the petitioner. Hence, petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected.

utkarsh/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T