Rajeshwar Ram v. The State Of Bihar Through Deepak Kumar, The Chief Secretary And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3450 of 2018 Arising out of Letters Patent Appeal No.1293 of 2016 ====================================================== Rajeshwar Ram, Son of Late Hirai Ram, Resident of vilage- Laxmipur P.sLaukaha, District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Deepak Kumar, The Chief Secretary. 2.

The Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe welfare Department, Bihar Mahadalit Vikash Mission through Gautam Paswan, Project Director, Chief Minister Secretariat 4, Desh Ratna Marg, Patna, Bihar. 3.

Mayank Barbare, The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.

4.

Sirshat Kapil Ashok, the District Magistrate, Madhubani. 5.

Amrendra Kumar, the District Welfare Officer, Madhubani. 6.

Ganesh Kumar, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Phulparas, District- Madhubani. 7.

Sudhir Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Block- Khutauna, DistrictMadhubani. 8.

Amrendra Kumar, (District Welfare Officer-cum-Block Welfare Officer), Block Welfare Officer, Block- Khutauna, District- Madhubani. 9.

Bihari Ram, Son of Khattar Ram, Resident of Village- Balanpatti, P.S.- Laukaha, District- Madhubani.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR) 30-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present contempt application, the order under contempt has been complied with

Patna High Court MJC No.3450 of 2018(3) dt.30-01-2023 2/2 and, as such, the matter has become infructuous.

3. Learned counsel for the State reiterates and affirms the statements made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. In view of the above, the present contempt application stands disposed of.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) (Harish Kumar, J) Arish/- U