Pramod Kumar @ Sonu v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2410 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1887 Year- 2015 Thana -GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District- GAYA ====================================================== Pramod Kumar @ Sonu, Son of Onkar Lal, R/o Village - Kawakol, P.S. - Kawakol, Distt. - Nawada.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sandhya Deep D/o Bindeshwar Prasad R/o Mohalla - Nadraganj Pulpar, p.s. - Civil Lines, Distt : - Gaya.
.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Anjani Pd. Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P. No.2 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Compliant Case No. 1887 (C) of 2015, registered under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The accusation is of torturing and harassment of the complainant/O.P. No.2 by her husband and other in-laws due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry and removing her along with her minor child from the matrimonial house after snatching her personal belongings.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the joint prayer of the parties, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre, Patna High Court, Patna for settlement of dispute between the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2410 of 2017 (6) dt.14-09-2017 2/2 petitioner and O.P. No.2, who are husband and wife, where the matter was settled and, accordingly, petitioner went to his Sasural to take his wife O.P. No.2, but she was not ready to go with the petitioner. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P. No.2 submits that petitioner has not approached the O.P. No.2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. Gaya in connection with Compliant Case No. 1887 of 2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T