Jitendra Kumar Nishad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13885 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Subhansh Sahni S/o Late Ramsharan Sahni Resident of Village-Bhoraha, P.O.-Jajaur, P.S.-Katra, District-Muzaffarpur, Elected Secretary of Katra Prakhand Matasyajivi Sahyog Samiti Ltd., Katra. 2.

Katra Prakhand MatasyajiviSahyog Samiti Ltd., Katra through its Elected Secretary, Subhansh Sahni.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Pramandal , Muzaffarpur. 3.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

4.

The District Fisheries officer-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Muzaffarpur. 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Muzaffarpur.

6.

The District Co-operative Officer, Muzaffarpur. 7.

The Asst. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, East Andhal, Muzaffarpur. 8.

The Anchaladhikari, Block-Katra, District-Muzaffarpur 9.

Jitendra Kumar Nishad S/o-Chandeshwar Sahni, Resident of Village-Ktai, P.O.-Ufrauli, P.S.-Katra, District-Muzaffarpur, Chairman. 10.

Sukhdeo Sahni S/o-Late Kushehwar Sahni Resident of Village-Sahnauli, P.S.-Katra, District-Muzaffarpur.

11.

Bhola Sahni S/o-Late Sukhlal Sahni Resident of Village-Nagwara, P.S.- Katra, District-Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14191 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Jitendra Kumar Nishad Son of Sri Chandeshwar Sahani, Chairman of Katra Prakhand Matasyajeevi Sahyog Samiti Ltd. R/o- Village- Katai, P.S.-Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.

2.

Sukhdeo Sahani S/o- Late Kusheshwar Sahani, R/o- Sahanouli, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.

3.

Bhola Sahani, S/o- Late Sukhalal Sahani, R/o- Village-Nagawara, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.

4.

Katra Block Fisherman Co-operative Society Limited, through its elected Chairman.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through the Secretary, Animal and Fish Resources

Patna High Court CWJC No.13885 of 2023(6) dt.01-07-2024 2/3 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 3.

The Director, Directorate of Fisheries, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Fisheries Officer cum- Chief Executive Officer, Muzaffrapur. 5.

Sri Subansh Sahani, Son of Late Ram Sharan Sahani, R/o- Bhoraha, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13885 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18 For the Private Res.

:

Ms. Mahasweta Chatterjee, Advocate (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14191 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahasweta Chatterjee, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 For the Respondent :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2024 CWJC No. 13885 of 2023 Heard Mr. Amit Shrivastava, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Mahasweta Chatterjee, learned counsel for the private respondent as well as Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. After some arguments, learned senior counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to move before the appropriate forum for challenging the cancellation of their membership.

3. Permission is granted.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Patna High Court CWJC No.13885 of 2023(6) dt.01-07-2024 3/3 CWJC No. 14191 of 2023 Heard Ms. Mahasweta Chatterjee, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent as well as Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

3. Permission is granted.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) ajay/- U