Pampu Yadav @ Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57585 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -221 Year- 2015 Thana -KHIJARSARAI District- GAYA ====================================================== Pampu Yadav @ Pappu Yadav, son of late Ambika Yadav, resident of Village- Satmas, P.S.- Khizarsarai, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-01-2016 Heard Sri Ranjan Kumar Jha, learned counsel, who was assisted by Sri Chaudhary Prem Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.

The petitioner, who is in custody only since 14.8.2015 in connection with Khijarsarai P.S. Case No. 221 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Section 307 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act has prayed for grant of bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ofcourse in the F.I.R. it has been alleged that in the occurrence petitioner gave gun shot injury which hit the grand son of the informant but injury has not been corroborated by the doctor and he tried to persuade the court to accept his submission by way of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57585 of 2015 (2) dt.19-01-2016 2/2 referring to Annexure - '2' to the petition. He further submits that admittedly there was dispute relating to removal of ridge and it was a land dispute and the informant's side were trying to disturb the peaceful possession of the petitioner. On the aforesaid grounds he makes a prayer for grant of bail.

Besides hearing learned counsel for the parties, I have also perused the material on record. In the F.I.R. there is specific accusation against the petitioner of opening firing from gun and injury report which has been brought on record also suggests regarding the gun shot injury.

I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T